diff --git a/content/about/index.md b/content/about/index.md
index e194916..4bea573 100644
--- a/content/about/index.md
+++ b/content/about/index.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Other versions of this website
This page also exists on the [tildeverse](https://tildeverse.org/), a bunch of \*nix computers that let people sign up for shell accounts. A typical shell account features clients for IRC and email, common terminal/commandline utilities, and (most importantly) web hosting. Read about the tildeverse's [origins](https://web.archive.org/web/20180917091804/https://medium.com/message/tilde-club-i-had-a-couple-drinks-and-woke-up-with-1-000-nerds-a8904f0a2ebf), read [the FAQ](https://tilde.club/wiki/faq.html), pick [a tilde](https://tilde.club/%7Epfhawkins/othertildes.html) and [get started](https://tilde.club/~anthonydpaul/primer.html). My Tildeverse pages will serve as a "rough draft".
-Content on this site also appears on [my Gemini space](gemini://seirdy.one)
+Content on this site also appears on my Gemini capsule
Location (Rohan, meatspace)
---------------------------
diff --git a/content/posts/floss-security.md b/content/posts/floss-security.md
index fd846ed..ca6cd96 100644
--- a/content/posts/floss-security.md
+++ b/content/posts/floss-security.md
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Good counter-arguments
I readily concede to several points in favor of source availability from a security perspective:
-- Source code can make analysis _easier_ by _supplementing_ source-independent approaches. The lines between the steps I mentioned in the [four-step vulnerability-fixing process](#understanding-program-behavior) are blurry.
+- Source code can make analysis _easier_ by _supplementing_ source-independent approaches. The lines between the steps I mentioned in the [four-step vulnerability-fixing process](#how-security-fixes-work) are blurry.
- Patching vulnerabilities is important. Source availability makes it possible for the community, package maintainers, or reporters of a vulnerability to patch software. Package maintainers often blur the line between "packager" and "contributor" by helping projects migrate away from abandoned/insecure dependencies. One example that comes to mind is the Python 2 to Python 3 transition for projects like Calibre.[^12] Being able to fix issues independent of upstream support is an important mitigation against [user domestication](./../../../2021/01/27/whatsapp-and-the-domestication-of-users.html).
- Some developers/vendors don't distribute binaries that make use of modern toolchain-level exploit mitigations (e.g. PIE, RELRO, stack canaries, automatic variable initialization, [CFI](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ControlFlowIntegrity.html), etc.[^13]). In these cases, building software yourself with these mitigations (or delegating it to a distro that enforces them) requires source code availability (or at least some sort of intermediate representation).
- Closed-source software may or may not have builds available that include sanitizers and debug symbols.
diff --git a/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.gmi b/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.gmi
index 2cffe90..c309325 100644
--- a/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.gmi
+++ b/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.gmi
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ These engines pass most of the tests listed in the “methodology” section.
* Right Dao: very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. It plans on including query-based ads if/when its userbase grows.⁸
* Gigablast: It’s been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers Private.sh. Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality.
-* Gowiki: Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US.
+* Gowiki: Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US. Seems down as of early 2022.
=> https://rightdao.com Right Dao
=> https://gigablast.com/ Gigablast
@@ -110,12 +110,13 @@ These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work
* Infotiger: Allows choosing between multiple different sorting algorithms (date, text length, PageRank, and "AND"). Supports English and German. The legacy version allows submitting links via a web-form or email, but I don't know if that has an impact on the more recent alpha version.
* search.tl: Generalist search for one TLD at a time (defaults to .com). I'm not sure why you'd want to always limit your searches to a single TLD, but now you can.⁹ There isn't any visible UI for changing the TLD for available results; you need to add/change the "tld" URL paramater. For example, to search .org sites, append "&tld=org" to the URL. It seems to be connected to Amidalla.de, but Amidalla doesn't seem to currently be operational. Amidalla allows users to manually add URLs to its index and directory; I have yet to see if doing so impacts search.tl results.
* Kozmonavt: Has a small index of almost 5 million sites. If I want to find the website for a certain project, Kozmonavt works well (provided its index has crawled said website). It works poorly for learning things and finding general information. I cannot recommend it for anything serious since it lacks contact information, a privacy policy, or any other information about the org/people who made it. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs.
-* Burf.co: Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps. Down as of late June 2021.
+* Burf.co: Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps.
=> https://meorca.com/ Meorca Search Engine
=> https://alpha.infotiger.com/ Infotiger
=> http://www.search.tl search.tl
=> https://kozmonavt.ml/ Kozmonavt
+=> https://burf.co/ Burf.co
* ChatNoir: An experimental engine by researchers that uses the Common Crawl index. The engine is open source. There's more information in its announcement on the Common Crawl mailing list (Google Groups).
diff --git a/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.md b/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.md
index e49e706..937e907 100644
--- a/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.md
+++ b/content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.md
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ These are large engines that pass all the above tests and more.
- Yahoo
- DuckDuckGo[^3]
- AOL
- - Qwant (partial)[^4]
+ - Qwant (partial)[^4]
- Ecosia
- Ekoru
- Privado
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ These engines pass most of the tests listed in the "methodology" section.
- [Right Dao](https://rightdao.com): very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. It plans on including query-based ads if/when its user base grows.[^8]
- [Gigablast](https://gigablast.com/): It's been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers [Private.sh](https://private.sh). Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality.
-- [Gowiki](https://gowiki.com): Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US.
+- [Gowiki](https://gowiki.com): Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US. Seems down as of early 2022.
### Smaller indexes, hit-and-miss
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work
- [Infotiger](https://alpha.infotiger.com/): Allows choosing between multiple different sorting algorithms (date, text length, PageRank, and "AND"). Supports English and German. The legacy version allows submitting links via a web-form or email, but I don't know if that has an impact on the more recent alpha version.
- [search.tl](http://www.search.tl/): Generalist search for one TLD at a time (defaults to .com). I'm not sure why you'd want to always limit your searches to a single TLD, but now you can.[^9] There isn't any visible UI for changing the TLD for available results; you need to add/change the `tld` URL parameter. For example, to search .org sites, append `&tld=org` to the URL. It seems to be connected to [Amidalla](http://www.amidalla.de/), but Amidalla doesn't seem to currently be operational. Amidalla allows users to manually add URLs to its index and directory; I have yet to see if doing so impacts search.tl results.
- [Kozmonavt](https://kozmonavt.ml/): Has a small index of almost 5 million sites. If I want to find the website for a certain project, Kozmonavt works well (provided its index has crawled said website). It works poorly for learning things and finding general information. I cannot recommend it for anything serious since it lacks contact information, a privacy policy, or any other information about the org/people who made it. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs.
-- Burf.co: Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps. Down as of late June 2021.
+- [Burf.co](https://burf.co/): Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps.
- [ChatNoir](https://www.chatnoir.eu/): An experimental engine by researchers that uses the [Common Crawl](https://commoncrawl.org/) index. The engine is [open source](https://github.com/chatnoir-eu). See the [announcement](https://groups.google.com/g/common-crawl/c/3o2dOHpeRxo/m/H2Osqz9dAAAJ) on the Common Crawl mailing list (Google Groups).
### Unusable engines, irrelevant results
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ Some of this content came from the [Search Engine Map](https://www.searchenginem
Matt from Gigablast also gave me some helpful information on GBY which I included in the "Rationale" section. He's written more about big tech in the [Gigablast blog](https://gigablast.com/blog.html).
-Nicholas A. Ferrell of [The New Leaf Journal](https://thenewleafjournal.com/) wrote a [great post](https://thenewleafjournal.com/a-2021-list-of-alternative-search-engines-and-search-resources/) on alternative search engines. He also gave me some [useful details](https://lists.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one-comments/%3C20210618031450.rb2twu4ypek6vvl3%40rkumarlappie.attlocal.net%3E) about Seznam, Naver, Baidu, and Goo.
+Nicholas A. Ferrell of [The New Leaf Journal](https://thenewleafjournal.com/) wrote a [great post](https://thenewleafjournal.com/a-2021-list-of-alternative-search-engines-and-search-resources/) on alternative search engines. He also gave me some [useful details](https://lists.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one-comments/%3C20210618031450.rb2twu4ypek6vvl3%40rkumarlappie.attlocal.net%3E) about Seznam, Naver, Baidu, and Goo.
[^1]: Yes, "indexes" is an acceptable plural form of the word "index". The word "indices" sounds weird to me outside a math class.
diff --git a/content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi b/content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi
index b1b329d..d8fa30e 100644
--- a/content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi
+++ b/content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Exceptions exist: one or two very simple responsive changes won't hurt. For exam
Nontrivial use of width-selectors, in CSS or "