From 39abab14725f42a4161880258dea896738ffaaa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:51:10 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] syndicate --- content/notes/motivations-for-dropping-jpeg-xl.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/notes/motivations-for-dropping-jpeg-xl.md b/content/notes/motivations-for-dropping-jpeg-xl.md index 72c9a55..69927e3 100644 --- a/content/notes/motivations-for-dropping-jpeg-xl.md +++ b/content/notes/motivations-for-dropping-jpeg-xl.md @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ replyTitle: "with the jpeg xl thing…pushing their own formats is convenient fo replyType: "SocialMediaPosting" replyAuthor: "Eevee" replyAuthorURI: "https://eev.ee/" +syndicatedCopies: + - title: 'The Fediverse' + url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/ARaAr2S33jEXsaYLWy' --- I do find their decision to drop JPEG-XL from Chromium problematic because it was clearly an example of them ignoring everyone else, showing the limits of Chromium's collaborative decision making. However, "pushing their own formats" wasn't one of their reasons: