From 360edfa0dee959bb240bfbbf652029ee81e326aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:42:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Typos --- content/site-design.md | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/site-design.md b/content/site-design.md index 4c9fa41..d38c86f 100644 --- a/content/site-design.md +++ b/content/site-design.md @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ I also go further than WCAG in many aspects: - I ensure at least one such 56-by-56 px non-interactive region exists on the page, for users with hand tremors or or anyone who wants to tap the screen without clicking something. -- I only set custom colors in response to the `prefers-color-scheme: dark` media query. These custom colors pass APCA contrast ratios, all being close to the ideal lightness contrast of 90. They are also autism- and overstimulation-friendly colors: yellow links are significantly de-saturated to reduce harshness. +- With the exception of in-text borders, I only set custom colors in response to the `prefers-color-scheme: dark` media query. These custom colors pass APCA contrast ratios, all being close to the ideal lightness contrast of 90. They are also autism- and overstimulation-friendly colors: yellow links are significantly de-saturated to reduce harshness. - I ensure that the page works on extremely narrow viewports without triggering two-dimensional scaling. It should work at widths well below 200 CSS pixels. @@ -55,7 +55,15 @@ I test each WCAG success criterion myself using the mainstream browser engines ( I also accept user feedback. Users are free to contact me through any means linked on my [About page](../about/). -Finally, I supplement manual testing with automated tools. I run [axe-core](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core), the [IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker](https://www.ibm.com/able/toolkit/verify/automated), [AInspector](https://github.com/ainspector/ainspector-for-firefox), the [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/), and [ARC Toolkit](https://www.tpgi.com/arc-platform/arc-toolkit/). WAVE reports no errors; AXE is unable to determine certain contrast errors, but it otherwise reports no errors; IBM Equal Access reports no errors but some items that need review. +Finally, I supplement manual testing with the following automated tools: + +- [axe-core](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core) +- [IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker](https://www.ibm.com/able/toolkit/verify/automated) +- [AInspector](https://github.com/ainspector/ainspector-for-firefox) +- [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/) +- [ARC Toolkit](https://www.tpgi.com/arc-platform/arc-toolkit/) + +WAVE reports no errors; AXE is unable to determine certain contrast errors, but it otherwise reports no errors; IBM Equal Access reports no errors but some items that need review. Browser engine compatibility ---------------------------- @@ -89,7 +97,7 @@ The aforementioned metadata (microdata, microformats) has improved reading-mode This site should fully support the Readability algorithm. The Readability algorithm is used by Firefox and Vivaldi. It's the basis of one of multiple distillers used by Brave; Brave typically uses its Readability-based logic on seirdy.one. Readability is the only article distillation algorithm I try to actively support. -This site happens to fully supports Apple's Reader Mode and Azure Immersive Reader (AIR), the latter of which powers Microsoft Edge's reading mode. Unfortunately, AIR applies a stylesheet atop the extracted article that makes figures difficult to read: it centers text in figures, included pre-formatted blocks. I filed an issue on AIR's feedback forum, but that forum was subsequently deleted. +This site happens to fully support Apple's Reader Mode and Azure Immersive Reader (AIR), the latter of which powers Microsoft Edge's reading mode. Unfortunately, AIR applies a stylesheet atop the extracted article that makes figures difficult to read: it centers text in figures, included pre-formatted blocks. I filed an issue on AIR's feedback forum, but that forum was subsequently deleted. This site works well in the Diffbot article extractor. Diffbot powers a variety of services, including Instapaper.